Steps 1 to 10
- 1Does Jesus descend from Solomon or Nathan?Matthew 1.6
- 2The transfigurationMatthew 17.5-9
- 3Did the centurion come to Jesus in person?Matthew 8.5-13
- 4Has anyone ascended to heaven apart from Jesus?John 3.13
- 5Did the Women Receive an Explanation?Mark 16.5-6
- 6Introduction2 Timothy 3.16
- 7Who is Joseph's father?Matthew 1.16
- 8Who is Shealtiel's father?Matthew 1.12
- 9Who is Uzziah's father?Matthew 1.8
- 10Who is Jeconiah's father?Matthew 1.8
Steps 11 to 20
- 11The exact number of generations in Matthew?Matthew 1.17
- 12Who is Shelah's father?Genesis 10.24
- 13Was John the Baptist the Elijah who was to come?Matthew 11.14
- 14Would Jesus inherit David's throne?Luke 1.32
- 15The colt and the donkey?Mark 11.7
- 16Peter’s discovery?Matthew 16.15-17
- 17Jesus’ meeting with Peter?Matthew 4.18-22
- 18Jairus' daughterMatthew 9.18
- 19The staff for the journeyMark 6.7-9
- 20John the Baptist risen from the dead?Matthew 14.1-2
Steps 21 to 30
- 21John the Baptist’s doubts?John 1.32-34
- 22Jesus' testimony?John 5.31
- 23The cleansing of the Temple?Matthew 21.12
- 24The cursed fig tree?Matthew 21.18-20
- 25Judas's kiss?Matthew 26.48-50
- 26Peter's denial?John 13.38
- 27Does Jesus carry his cross?John 19.17
- 28The veil of the temple?Matthew 27.50-51
- 29The parables?John 18.20
- 30The hour of the crucifixion?Mark 15.25
Steps 31 to 40
- 31The robbers on the cross?Luke 23.32-33
- 32When did Jesus ascend to heaven?Luke 23.43
- 33Judas's pay?Acts 1.18
- 34The death of Judas?Matthew 27.5
- 35The field of blood?Matthew 27.8
- 36Jesus as the ransom?Mark 10.45
- 37Did Herod want to kill John the Baptist?Matthew 14.5
- 38The tenth apostle's name?Matthew 10.1-4
- 39How many times did Jesus withdraw from his disciples to pray?Matthew 26.36-46
- 40What were the words of Jesus' second prayer?Mark 14.33-36
Steps 41 to 50
- 41In which language did Jesus speak?Matthew 27.46
- 42When do women buy herbs?Mark 16.1
- 43Purpose of the women's visit to the tombMark 16.1
- 44A paralysed man carried by four menMatthew 9.2-8
- 45The staff for the journeyMatthew 10.9-10
- 46The sign of JonahMatthew 16.1-4
- 47The leaven of the PhariseesMatthew 16.11-12
- 48The disciples’ lack of understandingMatthew 17.22-23
- 49Word of God or word of Moses?Matthew 19.3-6
- 50Eternal lifeMatthew 19.16-17
Steps 51 to 53
-
CTD003
Does Jesus descend from Solomon or Nathan?
The article discusses the divergence between Jesus' genealogies in the Gospels, asking whether he descends from Solomon or Nathan. By analysing the historical contexts and various hypotheses, it concludes that this difference is not a significant contradiction but a complex question concerning biblical genealogies.
Numbers 27.1-11 (King James Version) :Then came the daughters of Zelophehad, the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of Manasseh the son of Joseph: and these are the names of his daughters; Mahlah, Noah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Tirzah.Notedone…: Heb. diminishedAnd they stood before Moses, and before Eleazar the priest, and before the princes and all the congregation, by the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, saying,Our father died in the wilderness, and he was not in the company of them that gathered themselves together against the LORD in the company of Korah; but died in his own sin, and had no sons.Why should the name of our father be done away from among his family, because he hath no son? Give unto us therefore a possession among the brethren of our father.And Moses brought their cause before the LORD.And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,The daughters of Zelophehad speak right: thou shalt surely give them a possession of an inheritance among their father’s brethren; and thou shalt cause the inheritance of their father to pass unto them.And thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a man die, and have no son, then ye shall cause his inheritance to pass unto his daughter.And if he have no daughter, then ye shall give his inheritance unto his brethren.And if he have no brethren, then ye shall give his inheritance unto his father’s brethren.And if his father have no brethren, then ye shall give his inheritance unto his kinsman that is next to him of his family, and he shall possess it: and it shall be unto the children of Israel a statute of judgment, as the LORD commanded Moses.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD070
The transfiguration
This article analyses the apparent differences between the Gospel accounts of Jesus' transfiguration. It assesses the unique perspectives of Matthew, Mark and Luke, noting John's silence on this event. The variations between the accounts are considered complementary, enriching our understanding of this key episode in Christian theology.
Mark 9.7-8 (King James Version) :And there was a cloud that overshadowed them: and a voice came out of the cloud, saying, This is my beloved Son: hear him.And suddenly, when they had looked round about, they saw no man any more, save Jesus only with themselves.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD045
Did the centurion come to Jesus in person?
The article examines a contradiction between Matthew and Luke concerning the encounter between Jesus and the centurion at Capernaum. Matthew describes a direct encounter, while Luke mentions intermediaries. The differences are explained by the principle of representation, the progression of events, and differing editorial styles. These variations do not alter the substance of the accounts.
Matthew 8.5-13 (King James Version) :And when Jesus was entered into Capernaum, there came unto him a centurion, beseeching him,And saying, Lord, my servant lieth at home sick of the palsy, grievously tormented.And Jesus saith unto him, I will come and heal him.The centurion answered and said, Lord, I am not worthy that thou shouldest come under my roof: but speak the word only, and my servant shall be healed.For I am a man under authority, having soldiers under me: and I say to this man, Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh; and to my servant, Do this, and he doeth it.When Jesus heard it, he marvelled, and said to them that followed, Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel.And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven.But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.And Jesus said unto the centurion, Go thy way; and as thou hast believed, so be it done unto thee. And his servant was healed in the selfsame hour.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD046
Has anyone ascended to heaven apart from Jesus?
The article examines the apparent contradiction between Jesus' statements in John 3.13 and the account of Elijah being taken up in 2 Kings 2.11. It explains that Jesus is speaking of a unique divine authority and heavenly revelation that he alone possesses, whereas Elijah is miraculously transported by God. The term “heaven” has various meanings, and definitive access to the divine presence is linked solely to Jesus.
Hebrews 11.5 (King James Version) :By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD052
Did the Women Receive an Explanation?
The article analyzes the Gospel accounts of Jesus' resurrection, showing that they are complementary rather than contradictory. Mary Magdalene is thought to have left the tomb before the angelic announcement, explaining her initial ignorance of the resurrection. Placed in context, the texts reveal a coherent chronology.
Mark 16.5-6 (King James Version) :And entering into the sepulchre, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment; and they were affrighted.And he saith unto them, Be not affrighted: Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified: he is risen; he is not here: behold the place where they laid him.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD001
Introduction
The article explores perceived contradictions in the Gospels, arguing that they reflect the depth of biblical revelation rather than errors. Despite apparent divergences, the Gospels are viewed as factual, coherent accounts guaranteed by divine inspiration. Websites presenting contradictions are criticised for their lack of analysis.
John 3.16-17 (King James Version) :For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD002
Who is Joseph's father?
This article explores the apparent contradiction between Matthew and Luke concerning the father of Joseph, Mary's husband. It proposes that Matthew presents Joseph's lineage and Luke presents Mary's, thus resolving the discrepancy. This demonstrates the coherence and complementary nature of the Gospels.
Deuteronomy 25.5-6 (King James Version) :If brethren dwell together, and one of them die, and have no child, the wife of the dead shall not marry without unto a stranger: her husband’s brother shall go in unto her, and take her to him to wife, and perform the duty of an husband’s brother unto her.Noteher husband’s…: or, her next kinsmanNotebrother’s: or, next kinsman’sAnd it shall be, that the firstborn which she beareth shall succeed in the name of his brother which is dead, that his name be not put out of Israel.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD004
Who is Shealtiel's father?
This article examines the alleged contradiction in the Gospels concerning Shealtiel's father. It proposes understanding the genealogical discrepancy as a difference in the ways kinship was established in biblical times, rather than as a contradiction.
Matthew 1.12 (King James Version) :And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel;King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD005
Who is Uzziah's father?
This article explores the apparent contradiction between Matthew 1:8 and 2 Chronicles 26:1 concerning Uzziah's father. Although Matthew names Joram as Uzziah's father, 2 Chronicles identifies him as Amaziah. The term 'son' can refer to a distant descendant, and Matthew's genealogies are shortened for theological reasons.
Matthew 1.8 (King James Version) :And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias;King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD006
Who is Jeconiah's father?
The article explores an apparent contradiction in the Bible concerning Jeconiah's father between Matthew and Chronicles. By analysing these perspectives, it shows that these are differences in the presentation of genealogies, without genuine contradictions.
1 Chronicles 3.16 (King James Version) :And the sons of Jehoiakim: Jeconiah his son, Zedekiah his son.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD007
The exact number of generations in Matthew?
The article examines the apparent discrepancy between thirteen and fourteen generations announced in Matthew 1.17, resolved by including Mary in the genealogy. This reflects a theological intention in which the Messiah is not fathered by a man but conceived by the Holy Spirit, thus restoring the coherence of Scripture.
John 3.16-17 (King James Version) :For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD008
Who is Shelah's father?
This article examines the question of Shelah's paternity in the Bible. Two genealogies differ: Genesis names Arphaxad as Shelah's father, while Luke introduces Cainan as an intermediary. This discrepancy is not a contradiction but reflects parallel textual traditions, offering a richer understanding of Scripture.
Luke 3.35-36 (King James Version) :Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala,Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech,King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD009
Was John the Baptist the Elijah who was to come?
Jesus regards John the Baptist as the prophesied Elijah, indicating a symbolic mission, but John denies this identity literally, according to John 1:19-21. This distinction between mission and personal identity clarifies an apparent biblical contradiction.
Luke 1.17 (King James Version) :And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD010
Would Jesus inherit David's throne?
The article clarifies an apparent contradiction concerning Jesus and David's throne. It explains how the genealogies in Matthew and Luke, though distinct, complement one another to establish Jesus' legitimacy both legally and by natural descent, without a connection to Jehoiakim's cursed line.
Luke 1.32 (King James Version) :He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David:King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD011
The colt and the donkey?
Article CTD011 responds to an alleged contradiction about the number of animals at Jesus' entry into Jerusalem. Mark and Luke mention a colt, while Matthew mentions a donkey and her colt. The author shows that this is not a contradiction but a difference of focus: Matthew, writing for a Jewish audience, emphasizes the literal fulfillment of the prophecy in Zechariah 9.9. Jesus rode only one animal, the colt, but the donkey's presence is mentioned for its prophetic and practical context.
Mark 11.7 (King James Version) :And they brought the colt to Jesus, and cast their garments on him; and he sat upon him.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD012
Peter’s discovery?
Article CTD012 addresses an alleged contradiction between John 1.41 and Matthew 16.17 concerning Peter's discovery of Jesus' messianic identity. These two passages actually describe two complementary stages: an initial human announcement made by Andrew, followed by an inward divine revelation confirmed by Jesus himself. Peter's faith is a gradual journey, not a single event.
John 12.16 (King James Version) :These things understood not his disciples at the first: but when Jesus was glorified, then remembered they that these things were written of him, and that they had done these things unto him.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD013
Jesus’ meeting with Peter?
Article CTD013 addresses a classic objection: where did Jesus first meet Peter and Andrew? Matthew places the encounter in Galilee, John on the banks of the Jordan. The article demonstrates that these are two distinct stages: an initial encounter in Judea (John), followed by a definitive call in Galilee (Matthew). The two accounts are complementary, not contradictory, and illustrate the gradual development of the disciples' calling.
John 1.41-42 (King James Version) :He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ.And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD014
Jairus' daughter
Article CTD014 examines the alleged contradiction between Matthew 9.18 and Mark 5.23 concerning the condition of Jairus's daughter. Matthew says she is dead, Mark that she is dying. The analysis shows that these accounts are complementary: Mark describes a narrative progression in which the death occurs along the way, while Matthew condenses the event by presenting the final condition directly. There is no contradiction, but two distinct editorial styles recounting the same miracle.
Matthew 9.18 (King James Version) :While he spake these things unto them, behold, there came a certain ruler, and worshipped him, saying, My daughter is even now dead: but come and lay thy hand upon her, and she shall live.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD015
The staff for the journey
Article CTD015 addresses an Islamic objection concerning an alleged Gospel contradiction: did Jesus permit or forbid a staff on the disciples' mission? Mark 6.8 permits it, while Matthew 10.9-10 and Luke 9.3 seem to forbid it. The analysis shows that Matthew and Luke state the general principle of travelling unencumbered, while Mark clarifies that a staff, an everyday object already owned, is not covered by this prohibition. There is therefore no contradiction, but complementary teaching.
Mark 6.7-9 (King James Version) :And he called unto him the twelve, and began to send them forth by two and two; and gave them power over unclean spirits;And commanded them that they should take nothing for their journey, save a staff only; no scrip, no bread, no money in their purse:But be shod with sandals; and not put on two coats.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD016
John the Baptist risen from the dead?
Article CTD016 examines the alleged contradiction between Matthew 14.2, Mark 6.14 and Luke 9.7-9 concerning Herod Antipas' opinion of Jesus. Luke portrays Herod as uncertain, while Matthew and Mark report his private statement identifying Jesus with John the Baptist raised from the dead. The author demonstrates that there is no contradiction but a complementary narrative, explained by the publishing constraints of the first century.
Mark 6.14 (King James Version) :And king Herod heard of him; (for his name was spread abroad:) and he said, That John the Baptist was risen from the dead, and therefore mighty works do shew forth themselves in him.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD018
John the Baptist’s doubts?
The article explores the alleged contradiction between the Gospels of John and Matthew concerning John the Baptist's recognition of Jesus as the Messiah. It concludes that this is not a contradiction but a development in understanding in the face of unfulfilled messianic expectations.
John 1.32-34 (King James Version) :And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him.And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD019
Jesus' testimony?
The article 'CTD019 - Jesus' testimony?' examines an alleged contradiction in the Gospel of John concerning Jesus' testimony. Jesus acknowledges human legal standards but emphasises the divine truth of his identity. In John 5,31, he aligns himself with human criteria for truthfulness, while in John 8,14, he affirms the validity of his divine testimony.
John 5.31 (King James Version) :If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD020
The cleansing of the Temple?
The article explores the apparent divergence between Matthew and Mark concerning Jesus' cleansing of the Temple. Matthew presents an immediate action, while Mark distinguishes two days. The analysis reveals that Matthew uses a thematic approach to show Jesus' authority, without contradicting Mark. There is therefore no genuine contradiction between the accounts.
Mark 11.11-17 (King James Version) :And Jesus entered into Jerusalem, and into the temple: and when he had looked round about upon all things, and now the eventide was come, he went out unto Bethany with the twelve.And on the morrow, when they were come from Bethany, he was hungry:And seeing a fig tree afar off having leaves, he came, if haply he might find any thing thereon: and when he came to it, he found nothing but leaves; for the time of figs was not yet.And Jesus answered and said unto it, No man eat fruit of thee hereafter for ever. And his disciples heard it.And they come to Jerusalem: and Jesus went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves;And would not suffer that any man should carry any vessel through the temple.And he taught, saying unto them, Is it not written, My house shall be called of all nations the house of prayer? but ye have made it a den of thieves.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD021
The cursed fig tree?
This article explores the supposed contradiction between two biblical accounts of the fig tree cursed by Jesus in the Gospels of Matthew and Mark, finding complementary perspectives in them.
Matthew 21.18-20 (King James Version) :Now in the morning as he returned into the city, he hungered.And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away.And when the disciples saw it, they marvelled, saying, How soon is the fig tree withered away!King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD022
Judas's kiss?
The article discusses narrative differences between the Gospels concerning Judas kissing Jesus. Matthew, Mark, and Luke explicitly recount the event, while John omits it, offering another perspective. This difference is seen as complementary, enriching understanding of Jesus' arrest.
Mark 14.44-45 (King James Version) :And he that betrayed him had given them a token, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is he; take him, and lead him away safely.And as soon as he was come, he goeth straightway to him, and saith, Master, master; and kissed him.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD023
Peter's denial?
This article examines the apparent contradiction in the Gospels concerning Peter's denial. It concludes that, although John and Mark present variations, they agree on the fulfilment of Jesus' prediction. The accounts are complementary, not contradictory.
Mark 14.72 (King James Version) :And the second time the cock crew. And Peter called to mind the word that Jesus said unto him, Before the cock crow twice, thou shalt deny me thrice. And when he thought thereon, he wept.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD024
Does Jesus carry his cross?
The article explores the alleged biblical contradiction between the Gospels concerning whether Jesus carried his cross alone or with the help of Simon of Cyrene. The analysis reveals that the accounts are complementary, showing that Jesus began carrying the patibulum but was helped by Simon under Roman compulsion. The Gospels agree on the historical sequence, emphasising the need to read Gospel texts in their overall context.
Matthew 27.31-32 (King James Version) :And after that they had mocked him, they took the robe off from him, and put his own raiment on him, and led him away to crucify him.And as they came out, they found a man of Cyrene, Simon by name: him they compelled to bear his cross.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD025
The veil of the temple?
This article discusses the alleged contradiction concerning the timing of Jesus' death and the tearing of the Temple curtain. The authors of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke do not aim at precise chronology but symbolically emphasise the opening of access to the divine presence.
Luke 23.44-46 (King James Version) :And it was about the sixth hour, and there was a darkness over all the earth until the ninth hour.And the sun was darkened, and the veil of the temple was rent in the midst.And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: and having said thus, he gave up the ghost.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD026
The parables?
This article discusses Jesus' parables, clarifying the absence of contradiction between their public and private interpretations. Parables are a teaching tool, not secret teachings.
Matthew 13.10-11 (King James Version) :And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD027
The hour of the crucifixion?
The article clarifies an apparent contradiction in the Gospels concerning the time of Jesus' crucifixion by explaining that they use different systems of timekeeping. Mark follows Jewish time while John follows Roman time, thus harmonizing the accounts.
Mark 15.25 (King James Version) :And it was the third hour, and they crucified him.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD028
The robbers on the cross?
This article explores how the accounts of Mark and Luke concerning the robbers crucified with Jesus complement each other. Mark describes the initial mockery, while Luke reveals one robber's repentance, highlighting his spiritual development.
Luke 23.32-33 (King James Version) :And there were also two other, malefactors, led with him to be put to death.And when they were come to the place, which is called Calvary, there they crucified him, and the malefactors, one on the right hand, and the other on the left.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD029
When did Jesus ascend to heaven?
This article explores the apparent contradiction between Luke 23.43 and John 20.17 concerning Jesus' ascension. It proposes that the term "today" indicates the certainty of the divine promise rather than an immediate action, highlighting the harmony of the Gospels when examined in their eschatological context.
John 20.17 (King James Version) :Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD030
Judas's pay?
The article analyses an apparent contradiction in the Bible concerning the use of Judas' money. The Gospels present two perspectives on responsibility for, and attribution of, the purchase of a field, emphasising that there is no genuine contradiction but a coherent account that is more symbolic than literal.
Acts 1.18 (King James Version) :Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD031
The death of Judas?
This article examines Judas Iscariot's death, described differently in Matthew and Acts. Although these accounts seem contradictory, reading them together shows that they complement each other. Matthew speaks of Judas' hanging, while Acts describes the fall of his body, forming a coherent account.
Matthew 27.5 (King James Version) :And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD032
The field of blood?
The article analyzes why the "Field of Blood" bears that name, drawing on the accounts in Matthew and Acts. These accounts do not contradict one another but offer theological and popular perspectives: the purchase with "blood money" and Judas's death.
Acts 1.19 (King James Version) :And it was known unto all the dwellers at Jerusalem; insomuch as that field is called in their proper tongue, Aceldama, that is to say, The field of blood.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD033
Jesus as the ransom?
This article analyses the notion of ransom in the Bible and refutes apparent contradictions. It distinguishes the uses of the term in the New and Old Testaments, highlighting their complementary nature. Jesus offers his life as a ransom for all, while Proverbs expresses a moral principle of protection for the righteous.
Proverbs 21.18 (King James Version) :The wicked shall be a ransom for the righteous, and the transgressor for the upright.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD035
Did Herod want to kill John the Baptist?
The article examines the Gospels of Matthew and Mark on the question of whether Herod Antipas really wanted to kill John the Baptist. Each Gospel presents a different but complementary perspective: Matthew describes Herod's desire to kill him as tempered by fear of the crowd, while Mark emphasizes Herodias's influence and Herod's fascination with John. This analysis portrays a Herod torn between his emotions and external pressures.
Mark 6.21-28 (King James Version) :And when a convenient day was come, that Herod on his birthday made a supper to his lords, high captains, and chief estates of Galilee;And when the daughter of the said Herodias came in, and danced, and pleased Herod and them that sat with him, the king said unto the damsel, Ask of me whatsoever thou wilt, and I will give it thee.And he sware unto her, Whatsoever thou shalt ask of me, I will give it thee, unto the half of my kingdom.And she went forth, and said unto her mother, What shall I ask? And she said, The head of John the Baptist.And she came in straightway with haste unto the king, and asked, saying, I will that thou give me by and by in a charger the head of John the Baptist.And the king was exceeding sorry; yet for his oath’s sake, and for their sakes which sat with him, he would not reject her.And immediately the king sent an executioner, and commanded his head to be brought: and he went and beheaded him in the prison,And brought his head in a charger, and gave it to the damsel: and the damsel gave it to her mother.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD036
The tenth apostle's name?
The article explores differences in the name of the tenth apostle in the Gospels. Thaddaeus (Matthew and Mark) and Judas son of James (Luke) refer to the same person, a common phenomenon arising from first-century naming practices.
Matthew 10.1-4 (King James Version) :And when he had called unto him his twelve disciples, he gave them power against unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal all manner of sickness and all manner of disease.Now the names of the twelve apostles are these; The first, Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother; James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother;Philip, and Bartholomew; Thomas, and Matthew the publican; James the son of Alphaeus, and Lebbaeus, whose surname was Thaddaeus;Simon the Canaanite, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD040
How many times did Jesus withdraw from his disciples to pray?
The article discusses the Gospel accounts of Jesus' prayers at Gethsemane. While Matthew and Mark report Jesus withdrawing three times to pray, Luke mentions only one withdrawal, illustrating a distinctive theological approach without contradicting the other Gospels.
Mark 14.32-42 (King James Version) :And they came to a place which was named Gethsemane: and he saith to his disciples, Sit ye here, while I shall pray.And he taketh with him Peter and James and John, and began to be sore amazed, and to be very heavy;And saith unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful unto death: tarry ye here, and watch.And he went forward a little, and fell on the ground, and prayed that, if it were possible, the hour might pass from him.And he said, Abba, Father, all things are possible unto thee; take away this cup from me: nevertheless not what I will, but what thou wilt.And he cometh, and findeth them sleeping, and saith unto Peter, Simon, sleepest thou? couldest not thou watch one hour?Watch ye and pray, lest ye enter into temptation. The spirit truly is ready, but the flesh is weak.And again he went away, and prayed, and spake the same words.And when he returned, he found them asleep again, (for their eyes were heavy,) neither wist they what to answer him.And he cometh the third time, and saith unto them, Sleep on now, and take your rest: it is enough, the hour is come; behold, the Son of man is betrayed into the hands of sinners.Rise up, let us go; lo, he that betrayeth me is at hand.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD041
What were the words of Jesus' second prayer?
The article examines two Gospel accounts of Jesus' second prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane. Matthew gives precise wording, while Mark summarises the essence of the prayer. The two versions illustrate a single, complementary fundamental message about Jesus' willingness to follow God's will.
Mark 14.33-36 (King James Version) :And he taketh with him Peter and James and John, and began to be sore amazed, and to be very heavy;And saith unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful unto death: tarry ye here, and watch.And he went forward a little, and fell on the ground, and prayed that, if it were possible, the hour might pass from him.And he said, Abba, Father, all things are possible unto thee; take away this cup from me: nevertheless not what I will, but what thou wilt.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD043
In which language did Jesus speak?
Article CTD043 addresses the alleged contradiction between Matthew (“Eli, Eli…”) and Mark (“Eloï, Eloï…”) regarding Jesus’ cry on the cross. Linguistic analysis shows that Jesus spoke Aramaic (as evidenced by “sabachthani” in both texts) and that the difference between “Eli” (the Hebrew form) and “Eloï” (the Aramaic form) simply reflects each evangelist’s adaptation to his readership. There is no contradiction.
Mark 7.34 (King James Version) :And looking up to heaven, he sighed, and saith unto him, Ephphatha, that is, Be opened.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD048
When do women buy herbs?
The article examines an alleged contradiction concerning when the women obtained spices to anoint Jesus' body, comparing Mark and Luke. It proposes a chronological harmonisation and highlights the context of Jewish burial practices.
Luke 24.1 (King James Version) :Now upon the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came unto the sepulchre, bringing the spices which they had prepared, and certain others with them.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD050
Purpose of the women's visit to the tomb
The article examines the Gospel accounts of the women's visit to Jesus' tomb, exploring their apparently different intentions. While Mark and Luke speak of spices, Matthew mentions visiting the tomb, and John focuses on its emptiness. Although the narratives appear divergent, they complement each other. Jewish burial practices help explain these differences.
Luke 24.1 (King James Version) :Now upon the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came unto the sepulchre, bringing the spices which they had prepared, and certain others with them.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD062
A paralysed man carried by four men
The article explores differences between Matthew's and Mark's accounts of Jesus healing the paralytic. Although the accounts vary, the article emphasizes that they are complementary, reflecting the authors' individual perspectives under divine inspiration and offering a rich view of the events.
Matthew 9.2-8 (King James Version) :And, behold, they brought to him a man sick of the palsy, lying on a bed: and Jesus seeing their faith said unto the sick of the palsy; Son, be of good cheer; thy sins be forgiven thee.And, behold, certain of the scribes said within themselves, This man blasphemeth.And Jesus knowing their thoughts said, Wherefore think ye evil in your hearts?For whether is easier, to say, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and walk?But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (then saith he to the sick of the palsy,) Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house.And he arose, and departed to his house.But when the multitudes saw it, they marvelled, and glorified God, which had given such power unto men.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD067
The staff for the journey
The article explores the apparent contradiction in the Gospels concerning the use of a staff on missionary journeys, comparing the accounts of Matthew, Mark, and Luke and proposing a harmonious interpretation.
Mark 6.8-9 (King James Version) :And commanded them that they should take nothing for their journey, save a staff only; no scrip, no bread, no money in their purse:But be shod with sandals; and not put on two coats.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD068
The sign of Jonah
The article addresses the apparent contradiction concerning 'the sign of Jonah' between Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. It explains the divergences through the Gospels' different audiences and their common aim of emphasising the importance of proclaiming the kingdom of heaven.
Luke 11.28-32 (King James Version) :But he said, Yea rather, blessed are they that hear the word of God, and keep it.And when the people were gathered thick together, he began to say, This is an evil generation: they seek a sign; and there shall no sign be given it, but the sign of Jonas the prophet.For as Jonas was a sign unto the Ninevites, so shall also the Son of man be to this generation.The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with the men of this generation, and condemn them: for she came from the utmost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here.The men of Nineve shall rise up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD069
The leaven of the Pharisees
The article explores the variety of Gospel presentations of Jesus' warning about the "yeast of the Pharisees", examining cultural and theological differences in Matthew, Mark, and Luke.
Matthew 16.11-12 (King James Version) :How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees?Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD071
The disciples’ lack of understanding
The article explores differences in the disciples' understanding of Jesus' words according to Matthew, Mark, and Luke. It argues that Matthew shows their sadness arising from a partial understanding of his death, while Mark and Luke indicate their lack of understanding of the resurrection. These complementary accounts enrich understanding of this event.
Luke 9.43-45 (King James Version) :And they were all amazed at the mighty power of God. But while they wondered every one at all things which Jesus did, he said unto his disciples,Let these sayings sink down into your ears: for the Son of man shall be delivered into the hands of men.But they understood not this saying, and it was hid from them, that they perceived it not: and they feared to ask him of that saying.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD072
Word of God or word of Moses?
This article examines a discrepancy between Matthew and Mark concerning divorce. It explains that Jesus speaks differently according to his audience: Jews, for whom divine law is intrinsically linked to Moses, and non-Jews, for whom a direct mention of Moses is more understandable. Both Gospels are considered faithful despite their distinct approaches.
Matthew 19.3-6 (King James Version) :The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD073
Eternal life
The article "Eternal Life" discusses a young man's question to Jesus about eternal life in the Synoptic Gospels, showing that the accounts contain no significant contradiction but offer mutually enriching perspectives.
Luke 18.18-20 (King James Version) :And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD074
Salome’s request
The article analyzes the accounts in Matthew and Mark of Salome and her sons James and John asking for a privileged place in the kingdom of God. The differences are examined to show that they complement one another rather than constitute a contradiction. Each Gospel offers a unique perspective, thus enriching understanding of the event.
Matthew 20.20-21 (King James Version) :Then came to him the mother of Zebedee’s children with her sons, worshipping him, and desiring a certain thing of him.And he said unto her, What wilt thou? She saith unto him, Grant that these my two sons may sit, the one on thy right hand, and the other on the left, in thy kingdom.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD075
The two blind men
This article explores the differences between the Gospel accounts of Jesus healing one or two blind men at Jericho. It examines Matthew, Mark and Luke, clarifying that narrative diversity does not imply a contradiction. It emphasises the importance of the authors' individual perspectives.
Mark 10.46-47 (King James Version) :And they came to Jericho: and as he went out of Jericho with his disciples and a great number of people, blind Bartimæus, the son of Timæus, sat by the highway side begging.And when he heard that it was Jesus of Nazareth, he began to cry out, and say, Jesus, thou Son of David, have mercy on me.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD076
The cursed fig tree
The article analyses the alleged biblical contradiction between Matthew's and Mark's accounts of the cursed fig tree, concluding that the two perspectives offer a complementary understanding of the same event.
Luke 13.6 (King James Version) :He spake also this parable; A certain man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard; and he came and sought fruit thereon, and found none.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org