Étude 1 sur 5 · Judas l’Iscariot, le traitre est identifié

  1. Étude 1 : Judas l’Iscariot, le traitre est identifié
  2. Étude 2 : Le baiser de Judas ?
  3. Étude 3 : Le salaire de Judas ?
  4. Étude 4 : La mort de Judas ?
  5. Étude 5 : Le champ du sang ?

The last day up to the crucifixion

  • PER311 Judas Iscariot, the traitor, is identified

    This article explores the betrayal of Judas Iscariot at the last Passover meal with Jesus. By analyzing the Gospel accounts, it highlights the disciples’ reactions and the theological implications of this crucial event in Jerusalem.

    Mark 14.18-21 (King James Version) :
    And as they sat and did eat, Jesus said, Verily I say unto you, One of you which eateth with me shall betray me.And they began to be sorrowful, and to say unto him one by one, Is it I? and another said, Is it I?And he answered and said unto them, It is one of the twelve, that dippeth with me in the dish.The Son of man indeed goeth, as it is written of him: but woe to that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! good were it for that man if he had never been born.
    King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org
    Read more

    Level: Intermediate Level: Intermediate

Contradictions

  • CTD022 Judas's kiss?

    L'article discute des différences narratives sur Judas embrassant Jésus entre les Évangiles. Matthieu, Marc et Luc relatent l'événement explicitement, tandis que Jean l'omet, offrant une autre perspective. Cette divergence est vue comme complémentaire, enrichissant la compréhension de l'arrestation de Jésus.

    Mark 14.44-45 (King James Version) :
    And he that betrayed him had given them a token, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is he; take him, and lead him away safely.And as soon as he was come, he goeth straightway to him, and saith, Master, master; and kissed him.
    King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org
    Read more

    Level: Intermediate Level: Intermediate

  • CTD030 Judas's pay?

    L'article analyse une contradiction apparente dans la Bible sur l'usage de l'argent de Judas. Les Évangiles montrent deux perspectives sur la responsabilité et l'attribution de l'achat d'un champ, soulignant qu'il n'y a pas de véritable contradiction mais un récit cohérent et plus symbolique que littéral.

    Acts 1.18 (King James Version) :
    Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.
    King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org
    Read more

    Level: Intermediate Level: Intermediate

  • CTD031 The death of Judas?

    Cet article examine la mort de Judas Iscariote, décrite différemment dans Matthieu et les Actes. Bien que ces récits semblent contradictoires, une lecture combinée montre qu'ils se complètent. Matthieu parle de la pendaison de Judas, tandis que les Actes décrivent la chute de son corps, formant un récit cohérent.

    Matthew 27.5 (King James Version) :
    And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself.
    King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org
    Read more

    Level: Intermediate Level: Intermediate

  • CTD032 The field of blood?

    L'article analyse pourquoi "Le champ du sang" est nommé ainsi, se basant sur les récits de Matthieu et des Actes. Ces récits ne se contredisent pas mais offrent des perspectives théologiques et populaires: l'achat avec le "prix du sang" et la mort de Judas.

    Acts 1.19 (King James Version) :
    And it was known unto all the dwellers at Jerusalem; insomuch as that field is called in their proper tongue, Aceldama, that is to say, The field of blood.
    King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org
    Read more

    Level: Intermediate Level: Intermediate