ANX002

Order of the chapters and chronological order

The present order of the book of Daniel is not strictly chronological. Chapters 7 and 8 report visions received under Belshazzar and are therefore earlier than the fall of Babylon told in Daniel 5. This difference between literary order and historical order is essential: it shows that the book was also arranged according to thematic, linguistic and theological correspondences.

11 min 9 verses 1 book

1. Two orders to distinguish

The normal reading of Daniel naturally follows the order of the twelve chapters:

Daniel 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → 6 → 7 → 8 → 9 → 10 → 11 → 12.

This order must be respected when studying the composition of the book.

However, it does not correspond exactly to the historical sequence of events.

Daniel himself provides several indications that allow us to see this.

Daniel 5 tells of the fall of Belshazzar.

Yet Daniel 7 begins with:

“In the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon, Daniel had a dream” (Daniel 7.1).

Daniel 8 then specifies:

“In the third year of the reign of King Belshazzar” (Daniel 8.1).

The events of Daniel 7 and Daniel 8 therefore precede those of Daniel 5 chronologically.

2. Comparative table

ChapterPosition in the bookChronological markerApproximate historical position
Daniel 11Beginning of Babylonian domination over Judahc. 605 BC
Daniel 22Reign of Nebuchadnezzarbeginning of Nebuchadnezzar's reign
Daniel 33Reign of Nebuchadnezzarprecise date not indicated
Daniel 44Reign of Nebuchadnezzarlate period of the reign, without an explicit date
Daniel 55Belshazzar's last night539 BC
Daniel 66Darius the Medeafter the fall of Babylon
Daniel 77First year of Belshazzarbefore Daniel 5
Daniel 88Third year of Belshazzarbefore Daniel 5
Daniel 99First year of Dariusafter the fall of Babylon
Daniel 1010Third year of CyrusPersian period
Daniel 1111Continuation of the revelation begun in Daniel 10same revelatory unit
Daniel 1212Conclusion of the revelation of Daniel 10-12same revelatory unit

This table immediately reveals the most important displacement:

Daniel 7 and Daniel 8 must chronologically be placed back before Daniel 5.

3. A simplified chronology

Following the main indications given by the text, the sequence can be represented approximately as follows:

Daniel 1Daniel's arrival in the Babylonian world.

↓

Daniel 2Nebuchadnezzar's dream and the vision of the statue.

↓

Daniel 3-4Events of Nebuchadnezzar's reign whose precise date is not given.

↓

Daniel 7First year of
Belshazzar.

↓

Daniel 8Third year of
Belshazzar.

↓

Daniel 5Last night of
Belshazzar and fall of Babylon.

↓

Daniel 6 and Daniel 9Period of Darius the Mede.

↓

Daniel 10-12Third year of Cyrus and the last great revelation.

This reconstruction must remain cautious for the chapters that do not provide a precise date.

4. Why is Daniel 7 not placed before Daniel 5?

The answer probably lies in the literary structure of the book.

Daniel 2 to Daniel 7 forms an Aramaic unit.

Within this unit, Daniel 2 and Daniel 7 answer each other.

Daniel 2 presents a succession of kingdoms in the form of a statue.

Daniel 7 also presents a succession of kingdoms, this time in the form of four beasts.

Both visions lead to a dominion established by God and destined never to pass away (Daniel 2.44; 7.13-14).

Placing Daniel 7 immediately after Daniel 6 therefore makes it possible to close the great unit begun in Daniel 2.

Its position thus answers more to a literary and theological logic than to a strict chronological one.

5. Why does Daniel 8 come after Daniel 7?

Daniel 8 opens a new stage.

The text returns to Hebrew.

The vision takes up the question of the kingdoms again but becomes more precise.

The ram is explicitly identified with the Medes and the Persians, while the goat is associated with Javan (Daniel 8.20-21).

The position of Daniel 8 thus allows a progression:

Daniel 2: the general framework of the kingdoms

↓

Daniel 7: resumption and deepening of the general framework

↓

Daniel 8: more precise identification of certain powers

The literary order therefore favors the progression of the revelation rather than the strict succession of dates.

6. Daniel 5 as a historical fulfilment within the book

This organization produces a particularly interesting effect.

Daniel 2 had announced to Nebuchadnezzar:

“After you shall arise another kingdom” (Daniel 2.39).

Daniel 5 then tells of the actual disappearance of Babylonian dominion.

Daniel interprets the writing that appeared on the wall:

“Your kingdom is divided, and given to the Medes and Persians” (Daniel 5.28).

The chapter ends with the death of Belshazzar and the arrival of Darius the Mede (Daniel 5.30-31).

The book is therefore not content with announcing the succession of kingdoms.

It also tells of the first great change of empire that Daniel witnesses.

What Daniel 2 had presented in prophetic form becomes, within the narrative itself, a historical event.

7. Daniel 6 and Daniel 9: two texts set under Darius

Daniel 6 and Daniel 9 both belong to the period that follows the fall of Babylon.

Daniel 6 presents Daniel under the authority of Darius.

Daniel 9 begins with a similar indication:

“In the first year of Darius the son of Ahasuerus, of the seed of the Medes” (Daniel 9.1).

Yet the two chapters are not placed next to each other.

Daniel 6 ends the series of the great court narratives.

Daniel 9 belongs to the Hebrew section of visions and revelations.

Once again, literary organization prevails over a simple chronological succession.

8. Daniel 10-12: not separating what the text unites

The situation is different for the last three chapters.

Daniel 10.1 provides the chronological framework:

“In the third year of Cyrus king of Persia, a word was revealed to Daniel.”

The revelation begins in chapter 10, continues in chapter 11 and ends in chapter 12.

The modern divisions into chapters can give the impression of three successive revelations.

It is, however, a single great unit.

Chronological order and literary order therefore coincide much more directly here.

9. Chronological order must not replace the order of the book

Reconstructing the is useful, but it would be methodologically incorrect to reorganize the book according to this chronology and to regard this new order as superior to the transmitted order.

Chronology answers the question:

When did the events take place?

The literary structure answers another question:

Why are the narratives and visions presented in this order?

The two approaches are complementary.

The first sheds light on the history of Daniel.

The second sheds light on the composition and message of the book.

10. Summary table

Literary orderSimplified chronological order
Daniel 1Daniel 1
Daniel 2Daniel 2
Daniel 3Daniel 3*
Daniel 4Daniel 4*
Daniel 5Daniel 7
Daniel 6Daniel 8
Daniel 7Daniel 5
Daniel 8Daniel 6 / Daniel 9
Daniel 9Daniel 10-12
Daniel 10-12-

* The exact chronological position of Daniel 3 and Daniel 4 cannot be determined with the same precision as that of the explicitly dated chapters.

This table therefore does not claim to provide an absolute chronology of each episode.

It only highlights the displacements that the indications of the text actually allow us to establish.

Conclusion of the appendix

The order of the book of Daniel is not disordered: it obeys a logic different from a simple chronology.

Daniel 7 and Daniel 8 provide the clearest demonstration of this. Their visions belong to the reign of Belshazzar and therefore precede the fall of Babylon told in Daniel 5.

Their present position, however, makes it possible to preserve two important constructions.

Daniel 7 closes the great Aramaic section of Daniel 2-7 and answers the vision of Daniel 2.

Daniel 8 then opens the last great Hebrew section and progressively deepens the identification of the kingdoms.

The distinction between chronological order and literary order thus constitutes an important key for the rest of the study:

la chronologie permet de suivre la vie de Daniel ; la structure permet de comprendre la construction de son livre.