PER158

The judgment of the Pharisees

Pericope PER158 analyzes the Pharisees' reaction to Jesus' miracles at Capernaum (Matt 9.33-34). While the crowd recognizes a divine work, the Pharisees attribute Jesus' actions to the devil. Their rejection is deliberate: accepting Jesus would mean losing their privileges. Yet some, such as Nicodemus, Joseph of Arimathea and Saul of Tarsus, would choose to follow him. The healed mute man, for his part, goes away in joy and gratitude.

6 min Pharisees judgment miracles of Jesus rejection of the Messiah Capernaum 6 verses 3 books

Resources

Biblical texts

Matthew
Matthew 9.33-34 (King James Version)

And when the devil was cast out, the dumb spake: and the multitudes marvelled, saying, It was never so seen in Israel.

But the Pharisees said, He casteth out devils through the prince of the devils.

Mark
Mark (King James Version) not cited in the book
Luke
Luke (King James Version) not cited in the book
John
John (King James Version) not cited in the book

Technical details

Year AD 32

Location: Capernaum in Galilee

Date: February or March AD 32

Method: We return to Matthew

Note on the method: Only Matthew reports this healing

Map of Capernaum

The reaction of the remains surprising.

The judgment of the Pharisees

The judgment of the Pharisees

Comments

It is interesting to observe the reaction of the to the actions of Jesus. Although they openly oppose him, the miracles Jesus performed suggest a divine presence, a conclusion the crowd seems to share.

The religious authorities refuse to recognize what seems obvious to everyone. They consequently maintain that it is by the power of the Devil that the Messiah Jesus performs all these deliverances (PER123 Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit).

It is important to note the difference between the response of the public and that of the religious authorities. These thus make a choice, that of rejecting the Messiah Jesus. The great majority of these men will keep this position, which will lead to the arrest and crucifixion of the Messiah Jesus.

What is the nature of the choice mentioned here? The were aware of the difference between Jesus' teaching and actions and what they themselves taught every in the .

Accepting what the Messiah Jesus proclaims means acknowledging that they are in error and, in their eyes, lowering themselves to the level of a common man. They would henceforth lose their influence and their privileges. In their eyes, the kingdom of God was not valuable enough to be exchanged for their way of life.

Their privileges blinded them.

We observe that despite the extraordinary events the witnessed, they remained free to accept or reject this message. However, it is established that some of them chose to follow the Messiah Jesus. Among them are Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea (John 3.1-21, John 7.50-52, John 19.38-42), as well as Saul of Tarsus (Acts 9.1-19) and perhaps even (Acts 4.34-39).

The mute man, for his part, went away happy, with a deep sense of gratitude toward God.