The Jewish Authorities

The authorities who ordered the arrest of Peter and John in Acts 4.1-3 were a group of particularly influential religious leaders. Luke mentions three distinct groups: the priests, the captain of the Temple, and the sadducéens — afficher la définition INF001. Their involvement helps us better understand the balance of power that existed in Jerusalem at the beginning of the Church.

1- The Priests

The “priests” were those who carried out the daily worship of the Temple. Some belonged to the most influential priestly families, and several sat on the Sanhédrin — afficher la définition INF003. Their office gave them considerable authority over the religious life of the people.

The Temple was the center of Jewish life. Seeing two Galileans teach publicly within its courts, draw crowds, and perform miracles could be perceived as a challenge to their authority. The priestly leaders had already played a decisive role in the trial of Jesus (John 11.47-53; John 18.13-14) and now found themselves confronted with his disciples.

2- The captain of the Temple

Luke also mentions “the captain of the Temple” (Acts 4.1). He was probably the head of the garde du Temple — afficher la définition INF381, a very important figure in the Jewish hierarchy. According to Jewish sources, notably the Mishnah, this official oversaw the Levites responsible for security and the maintenance of order within the sacred precincts.

He was not a romain — afficher la définition INF004 officer but a Jewish official. His duty was to prevent any disorder that might draw in the Roman authorities. His rank was particularly high, immediately after that of the high priest.

The arrest of Peter and John was therefore not an improvised initiative, but an official operation carried out by the recognized authorities of the Temple.

3- The Sadducees

Luke emphasizes above all the presence of the sadducéens — afficher la définition INF001 (Acts 4.1-2). This group was made up largely of the wealthiest and most influential priestly families. They generally maintained good relations with the Roman authorities in order to preserve their privileged position.

Unlike the pharisiens — afficher la définition INF002, the sadducéens — afficher la définition INF001 rejected several important doctrines:

• the resurrection of the dead (Matthew 22.23);
• the existence of angels and spirits (Acts 23.8);
• certain oral traditions developed by the pharisiens — afficher la définition INF002.

The apostles’ preaching directly challenged their convictions. To announce that Jesus had risen amounted to confirming the very doctrine they were fighting against. It is therefore not surprising that Luke stresses their irritation (Acts 4.2).

4- An Opposition Jesus Had Already Encountered

It is striking that the same groups who had contributed to the condemnation of Jesus now find themselves facing his disciples. In a sense, Peter and John continue the ministry of their Master and meet the same adversaries.

This continuity appears clearly in the Gospel accounts. The religious leaders had sought to reduce Jesus to silence (Mark 14.53-65); now they try to silence his witnesses.

5- The Sanhedrin in the Background

Although the Sanhédrin — afficher la définition INF003 is not yet explicitly mentioned in Acts 4.1-3, it already looms behind this arrest. The next day, Peter and John will indeed be brought before this supreme assembly (Acts 4.5-6).

The Sanhédrin — afficher la définition INF003 was composed of about seventy members, including:

• the high priest;
• the elders of the people;
• the chief priests;
• the scribes and teachers of the Law;
• representatives of the Sadducean and Pharisaic parties.

Under Roman rule, this institution retained broad religious and judicial authority, even though its power to carry out a death sentence was severely limited.

6- A Concern More Than Mere Doctrinal Hostility

The opposition of the Jewish authorities cannot be explained solely by theological differences. Several factors must have worried them:

• the rapid growth of the Christian movement (Acts 2.41);
• the growing influence of the apostles over the people;
• the miracles performed publicly (Acts 4.16);
• the risk of popular unrest that could provoke Roman intervention;
• the implicit challenge to their own religious authority.

A few weeks earlier, they had probably thought that the crucifixion of Jesus would put a definitive end to his movement. Yet they discover with surprise that his disciples are carrying on his work with a new assurance.

7- A First Confrontation Destined to Be Repeated

This arrest inaugurates a long series of clashes between the Jewish authorities and the apostles. Peter and John will appear several times before the Sanhédrin — afficher la définition INF003 (Acts 4.5-22; Acts 5.27-40), Stephen will be condemned to death (Acts 7.54-60), and Saul of Tarsus will become one of the Church’s chief persecutors before his conversion (Acts 8.1-3).

Paradoxically, this opposition would only contribute to the spread of Christianity, in keeping with the program announced by the Lord: “You will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth” (Acts 1.8).

8- An Interesting Remark

Luke does not mention the pharisiens — afficher la définition INF002 here. This silence is probably significant. The chief adversaries of the apostles in the first chapters of Acts seem to be the sadducéens — afficher la définition INF001 and the priestly families who controlled the Temple. The pharisiens — afficher la définition INF002, although opposed to the Christian movement on several points, sometimes appear more moderate, as the later intervention of Gamaliel — afficher la définition INF375 (Acts 5.34-39) will show. This nuance is important for understanding the diversity of first-century Judaism.