ANN115

Purgatory

The article discusses purgatory, a controversial non-biblical Catholic doctrine rejected by Protestants. It explores the origin of the term and compares the principles of purgatory with biblical teaching, criticizing the lack of scriptural foundation for certain aspects, such as prayer for souls.

16 min purgatory Catholicism doctrine purification 12 verses 6 books

For more information

Introduction

The Bible speaks of the kingdom of God or paradise as a place in the presence of God reserved for those who are saved. It also defines a place that will receive those who are lost. It is described as a place of torment and is called hell, Gehenna, or even Hades. In the Bible there are only these two references, or these two places corresponding to two states: saved and lost.

Some intellectuals in the 12th century imagined a third place, purgatory, in order to escape this judgment, considered too severe and too harsh. This concept took shape in the Catholic Church and was adopted, or confirmed, at the Council of Lyon in 1274.

In this study we propose to analyze this point of Catholic doctrine and to try to understand how an idea that is not found in the Bible came to become a dogma of the Catholic Church. The Protestant Church categorically rejects this precept.

I - Etymology of the word purgatory

The word purgatory comes from the Latin "purgatorium", the neuter noun derived from "purgatorius", meaning "purifying" or "that which purifies". This term itself comes from the verb "purgare", which means "to cleanse" or "to purge". Originally, people spoke of purgatorial fire before the word designated a specific place. This term therefore derives from the biblical principle of purification from sin, as stated in 1 John 1.9:

II - The principle of purgatory

Purgatory is considered by the Catholic Church to be a state after death in which souls that need further purification find themselves before entering the kingdom of God. Even if the idea is interesting, it is nevertheless, at first sight, contradicted by Hebrews 9.27:

So if we follow this idea of souls that are not completely forgiven, they would have to undergo additional personal purification. How is this purification carried out according to the principle proposed by the Catholic Church?

1 - By spiritual fire: Certain biblical texts, such as 1 Corinthians 3.13-15, speak of a fire that tests and purifies the works of believers.

In these verses, we do not find the principle of purification. They highlight everyone's works and assess their quality. Although works do not save, they nevertheless follow us. It is therefore important to judge each person's work, this judgment taking place on the day of the last judgment before the judgment seat of Christ. The of fire illustrates the quality of the works, as indicated in 1 Corinthians 3.12.

2 - By the prayers of the living: The Catholic Church encourages prayer for the souls in purgatory, notably through masses and specific intentions. This principle of praying for the dead and for their salvation has no scriptural basis. It is not recognized by the Protestant Church.

You can consult the appendix ANN110: Death, what the Bible says. Catholic exegetes put forward the following argument: according to 2 Timothy 1.16-18, the apostle Paul prays for Onesiphorus, who, following their interpretation, would be dead.

Onesiphorus

It is the apostle Paul who speaks of Onesiphorus, and he mentions him in only one instance:

2 Timothy 1.16-18 (King James Version) :
The Lord give mercy unto the house of Onesiphorus; for he oft refreshed me, and was not ashamed of my chain:But, when he was in , he sought me out very diligently, and found me.The Lord grant unto him that he may find mercy of the Lord in that day: and in how many things he ministered unto me at Ephesus, thou knowest very well.

2 Timothy 1.16-18 (King James Version) :
The Lord give mercy unto the house of Onesiphorus; for he oft refreshed me, and was not ashamed of my chain:But, when he was in , he sought me out very diligently, and found me.The Lord grant unto him that he may find mercy of the Lord in that day: and in how many things he ministered unto me at Ephesus, thou knowest very well.

Look at the NEG version.

2 Timothy 1.16-18 (King James Version) :
The Lord give mercy unto the house of Onesiphorus; for he oft refreshed me, and was not ashamed of my chain:But, when he was in , he sought me out very diligently, and found me.The Lord grant unto him that he may find mercy of the Lord in that day: and in how many things he ministered unto me at Ephesus, thou knowest very well.

Look at the Darby version.

2 Timothy 1.16–18 (PVV)

16 On the other hand, Onesiphorus often comforted me. May the Lord make his goodness felt to all his family. He, at least, was not ashamed to visit me in prison.

17 As soon as he arrived in , he set about actively searching for me; he shrank from no hardship, and so he finally found me.

18 May the Lord Jesus grant him to share in the goodness of God on that Day (of judgment). You know better than anyone how many services he rendered me in Ephesus.

The verse of 2 Timothy 1.16 states only the wish and prayer of the apostle Paul that God would bless the family of Onesiphorus. Indeed, in view of the journey he made to , we may suppose that Paul was implying his absence during that period.

The verse of 2 Timothy 1.18, particularly the first part: "May the Lord grant him to find mercy from the Lord on that day", can be difficult to interpret within the framework of a purgatory option. It may more simply mean that, at the last judgment, the apostle Paul wishes that the Lord would regard Onesiphorus's actions as beneficial and encouraging to himself. Moreover, it is possible that Paul hoped that Onesiphorus would never lose his faith and his salvation, unlike some of the people around him at that time.

3 - By divine mercy: Purgatory is a process enabling souls to attain the holiness necessary to enter paradise.

Divine mercy is expressed in the offer of universal salvation made to humanity through the atoning death of Jesus the Messiah. Holiness, understood as absolute purity or moral perfection, may seem unattainable. However, the notion of holiness as separation from the world becomes tangible through conversion to God.

III - The genesis of purgatory

It is worthwhile to examine the origin and historical development of this dogma, which, let us remember, remains entirely distinct from biblical doctrines. We consider that the do not belong to the canon of the Bible.

Prayer for the dead is mentioned in the Second Book of Maccabees, in 2 Maccabees 12.46. This passage describes Judas Maccabeus ordering an atoning sacrifice for the soldiers fallen in battle so that they might be delivered from their sins. This verse is cited as the "biblical" reference for the doctrine of purgatory and of prayer for the dead in Catholicism. It is important to note that the four books of Maccabees are not included in the biblical canon.

(The four books of Maccabees

There are four books of Maccabees, but their recognition varies according to religious traditions:

Judaism does not include them in the .

Catholicism recognizes only the first two as .

The Orthodox Churches accept all four books among the .

Protestantism regards them as apocryphal and classifies them among the intertestamental books.

The first two books recount the Maccabean revolt against the Seleucids, while the third and fourth books deal with philosophical and historical themes.)

The notion of purgatory began to take shape in the 11th century, but it was above all in the 12th century that it took on a more definite form. The historian Jacques Le Goff even speaks of the "birth of purgatory" at that time.

Subsequently, the doctrine was officially affirmed by the Catholic Church at the first Council of Lyon in 1245, then at the second Council of Lyon in 1274, and finally at the Council of Florence in 1439. The word "purgatory" itself was used for the first time in a decree of the Council of Trent in 1547.

It was at the Council of Trent (1545-1563) that purgatory was confirmed as a dogma, and the Catholic Church insists on the importance of prayers and indulgences for souls undergoing purification.

How can we explain this proposal of purgatory in the Middle Ages?

Doctrinal affirmation: The Church sought to structure its teaching on the afterlife more fully and to respond to the questions of the faithful about the fate of souls after death.

Encouragement of prayers and indulgences: The doctrine of purgatory made it possible to justify prayers for the dead and indulgences, which were a means for the living to help souls reach paradise.

Social and religious control: Some historians, such as Jean Delumeau, have suggested that the Catholic Church used purgatory in a "pastoral of fear" to strengthen its influence over the faithful.

Response to popular beliefs: Many local traditions already spoke of intermediate places or states after death. The Church incorporated these beliefs into an official doctrine.

Today, preaching on purgatory is less common, and the Catholic Church gives greater emphasis to divine mercy rather than to purifying sufferings. Although purgatory remains a Catholic dogma, it is less frequently addressed in contemporary theology.

IV - What the Bible states

The texts of the biblical canon do not mention an intermediate state between salvation and perdition. They take a binary approach, offering only two possibilities: "saved" or "lost".

The Bible states explicitly that man himself determines his future status by his earthly choices. Throughout his life, up to the last moment before death, he remains free to accept the salvation offered through the atoning death of Jesus the Messiah (Luke 23.39-43).

We will not revisit here the various studies we present on biblical doctrines. These appendices contain detailed statements based exclusively on the texts of the Bible.

This dogma therefore appears as an adaptation of the biblical text intended to make access to the kingdom of God easier. But this proposal remains a human word, rather like that of the artist (Michel Polnareff) who sang that everyone will go to Paradise. Human imagination has no power over the future of man.

Conclusion

Reflection on the notion of a limit suggests that certain individuals, by their choices or their course in life, may be considered definitively lost. Yet it remains possible to imagine that others would be "only just" lost, that is, that a tiny action would have been enough for them to obtain salvation. This questioning leads one to envisage the existence of a state of catching up, a kind of second chance available after death for those who were close to salvation.

However, this idea does not correspond to reality as it is presented in the Bible. The principles of salvation are clearly established there: it is a gift offered by God, and each individual retains the freedom to accept or refuse it during his earthly existence. Thus, those who choose to accept this gift are saved, whereas those who reject it are considered lost. According to this biblical perspective, there is therefore no intermediate possibility between acceptance and refusal of salvation; the notion of a second chance after death is not upheld.

2 Corinthians 5.20 (King James Version) :
Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ’s stead, be ye reconciled to God.